In September 1944, a full-scale mock-up of the aircraft was completed. In August 1944, the Air Force's requirements were adjusted to reduce the requirements for the aircraft's altitude. The choice of options for the aerodynamic schemes of the aircraft is underway, the models are being purged at TsAGI. Tupolev in September 1943 (Buttler, Gordon). The development of a high-altitude long-range bomber with a pressurized cockpit was started by OKB-156 A.N. What follows is a wall of info translated from Russian, so expect some odd grammar here and there: However, there was also an engine refit of the Tu-2 with the same Tu-10 designation, so I'm not sure what to make of it. Some sources state that it would have been "Tu-64," but looking at the trend of developmental vs production designations with other aircraft, I find this unlikely. In the base game's version of a '46 scenario, the USSR receives B-29s directly under lend-lease, designating them Tu-4s despite the bombers not being refitted or Russian-produced in any way.īut what if they hadn't received the B-29 at all? Without the Tu-4, what aircraft would fill that strategically important role? Well, let's have a look at one of those designs from before their acquisition of the B-29: the ANT-64, planned to receive the designation of Tu-10. Of course, once they actually appropriated a few B-29s, they tossed everything else and bootlegged the aircraft into the Tu-4. The basic idea: during and after WWII, the Soviets were attempting to develop long-range, high-altitude heavy bombers to match the capabilities of US B-29s. To even find any decent info, I had to reverse image search an attachment in someone's War Thunder forum post, which led me to a Russian website that I had to google translate relevant information from.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |